This post is based on a recent article published in the . The article can be read and is currently available open-access to all readers.
The discussion around climate change in China has undergone a notable transformation, moving from controversy to a more proactive stance in leadership. Initially prioritizing economic development over environmental concerns, China emerged as the top carbon emitter in 2006. The turning point came in 2015, marked by President Xi Jinping鈥檚 commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement. With the US withdrawal from the Agreement in 2019, China assumed a prominent role, pledging carbon neutrality by 2060. This study explores the language used in Chinese English-language news reports from 2015 to 2020, revealing a discourse of resistance that showcases China鈥檚 fight against climate change on the international stage.
While numerous studies in , and explored how climate change is reported in China, there is a noticeable gap in understanding the role of language. Existing studies, primarily focusing on Chinese-language reports, often utilize frame analysis, with limited attention to the unique discursive strategies employed by Chinese English-language news media targeting an international audience, shaping a distinctive narrative for China’s national image in the global discourse on climate change. The current study, published in full in the , aims to build upon these insights by specifically exploring the discursive construction of resistance to climate change in the Chinese English-language news media with the (DHA) within the broader framework of critical discourse analysis (CDA).
The chosen media outlets, China Daily, Global Times, People鈥檚 Daily Online, and Xinhua News Agency, represent China鈥檚 national-level English-language news sources. Journalists cater their reports to international English speakers and educated Chinese citizens, making these outlets essential for the Chinese government to communicate geopolitical messages to the world.
An in-depth analysis of the Chinese English-language media reveals three dominant themes strategically employed to construct a discourse of resistance against climate change. This exploration delves into the various linguistic strategies, including nomination, predication, argumentation, and mitigation, shedding light on the ideological use of language for specific communicative purposes.
Climate Change as a Global Enemy
Chinese English-language news media frame climate change as a global enemy, employing metaphors like 鈥渂attle鈥� and 鈥渇ight鈥� to convey urgency and the need for collective action. President Xi Jinping鈥檚 鈥渃ommunity with a shared future鈥� concept aligns with this, emphasizing global responsibility in addressing climate challenges. The media strategically uses war rhetoric, portraying climate change as a tangible adversary to mobilize international collaboration.
The term 鈥渃limate crisis,鈥� controversial for its emotional impact, is examined in the context of media influence. While it can evoke urgency, there鈥檚 a risk of backlash. The media鈥檚 framing fosters a resistance discourse, positioning humans as victims and emphasizing the threat posed by climate change.
The Paris Agreement is highlighted as a monumental triumph in the battle against climate change. News articles quote world leaders, like Ban Ki-moon, to lend credibility and stress the importance of unity in implementing the agreement. China鈥檚 advocacy for combating climate change aligns with its diplomatic concept of a shared future, promoting collectivism.
News articles underscore China鈥檚 adherence to the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) principle, emphasizing different responsibilities for developed and developing nations. China strategically employs CBDR to balance economic development and climate action, presenting it as a rallying point for other developing countries in the fight against climate change.
China as a Leading Climate Change Fighter
In the pre-Trump era, the US and China were portrayed as climate change leaders in news articles, utilizing the metaphor 鈥渁 country is a leader / general鈥�. Phrases like 鈥済lobal leader鈥� and 鈥渒ey role鈥� depicted the US positively. However, Trump鈥檚 withdrawal from the Paris Agreement altered this narrative. Trump鈥檚 withdrawal from the agreement is portrayed as prioritizing the interests of the fossil fuel industry over global climate commitments, leading to the negative categorization of his administration as an out-group opposed to climate change mitigation and global welfare.
The media highlighted Trump鈥檚 actions as detrimental, employing phrases like 鈥渘ot making efforts鈥� and 鈥渨ithdrawn from the agreement鈥� to negatively evaluate the US. In contrast, China鈥檚 commitment, dating back to a 2014 joint announcement with the US, positioned it as a global climate leader. Nomination strategies such as 鈥渓eading role鈥� reinforced China鈥檚 positive image, forming an in-group distinction.
To emphasize the 鈥渦s鈥� vs. 鈥渢hem鈥� dichotomy, the media quoted Pulgar-Vidal, indirectly attributing negative ideologies like 鈥渄enialism鈥� to the US. While commending China鈥檚 leadership, the media minimized its pollution levels and reliance on coal. Phrases like 鈥渓ags far behind鈥� mitigated China鈥檚 per capita emission rate, presenting a positive image.
Other Nations as Allies in the Fight
In the media鈥檚 narrative on climate change action, nations, especially China, are portrayed as crucial allies united against environmental threats, guided by the metaphor 鈥渘ations are allies鈥�. French President Emmanuel Macron鈥檚 acknowledgement of China as a global ally in climate change combat is frequently cited, solidifying the bond between France and China.
Post the 2017 UN Climate Change Conference, France and China committed to joint efforts for the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement. When the US withdrew, President Emmanuel Macron and President Xi Jinping issued a joint statement reaffirming support, emphasizing the global collaboration necessary for climate solutions.
Despite China鈥檚 historical skepticism, recent media reports indicate a shift in attitude, highlighting China鈥檚 role in rallying nations globally. Positive language is strategically used to depict US allies supporting climate action, backed by statistical evidence from surveys, reinforcing the narrative that a significant portion of Americans advocate for global cooperation on climate issues.
News articles amplify President Xi Jinping鈥檚 鈥渨in鈥搘in cooperation鈥� message, countering a zero-sum mentality. China鈥檚 commitment to contribute and adhere to the CBDR principle positions the nation as a selfless leader in the global fight against climate change.
In conclusion, this study draws on Wodak鈥檚 Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) to explore the discursive construction of resistance to climate change in Chinese English-language news media. The analysis uncovers three central themes: portraying climate change as a global enemy, positioning China as a leading climate change fighter, and framing other nations as allies in this endeavor. Through strategic use of language, such as nomination and argumentation, the media emphasizes global cooperation against climate change. These news articles serve as a diplomatic tool, redirecting attention from China鈥檚 carbon emissions to its global climate efforts. The study illuminates the role of language in climate communication, emphasizing its geopolitical significance and underscoring state-run media鈥檚 role in shaping China鈥檚 international image amid climate challenges.
This post is based on a recent article published in the . The article can be read and is currently available open-access to all readers.
Feature image: Photo by on